Recreational Boating Act 2007
976 People Have Sent 14,858 Letters and Emails
Sign the Petition
Some recent comments: these messages are published with permission of the signer.
Total Signers: 976 View More: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Total Signers: 976 View More: 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Sign the Petition
Petition created by BoatTEST.com
Powered by Rally Congress Have questions or feedback?
Digg
MySpace
Reddit
Twitter
Sun., Jun. 24, 2007 8:09 PM link Van B. | Ravenna, OH
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Sun., Jun. 24, 2007 8:02 AM link Sabin R. | Hanover, MD
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 22, 2007 11:29 PM link michael b. | Vermilion, OH
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 22, 2007 5:27 PM link alvin b. | massillon, OH
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 22, 2007 3:48 PM link lamon g. | Andalusia, AL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 22, 2007 2:41 PM link Sam S. | Henderson, NV
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 22, 2007 2:37 PM link Christopher S. | Saint Cloud, FL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 22, 2007 1:55 PM link william g. | ingleside, IL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 22, 2007 1:33 PM link carl m. | lorain, OH
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 22, 2007 8:57 AM link Starr G. | Elk Grove Village, IL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 21, 2007 2:56 PM link Lynne H. | Porter, TX
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 21, 2007 1:33 PM link Martin F. | Lake Villa, IL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 21, 2007 10:52 AM link James B. | Massillon, OH
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 21, 2007 4:12 AM link scott s. | Kent, OH
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 21, 2007 12:50 AM link Andrew M. | Mentor, OH
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 21, 2007 12:30 AM link James B. | Massillon, OH
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 21, 2007 12:09 AM link Daniel M. | McPherson, KS
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 10:51 PM link tom p. | chagrin falls, OH
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 9:38 PM link Michael D. | Milford, PA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 8:28 PM link timothy w. | Vandalia, OH
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 6:20 PM link PAT M. | LAKE VILLAGE, IN
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 5:16 PM link ALEX L. | romeoville, IL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 4:56 PM link Eric C. | Orange Park, FL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 1:55 PM link John W. | Arlington, TX
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 12:28 PM link Matt G. | Knoxville, TN
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 11:48 AM link Kevin C. | Chino Hills, CA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have onerous EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats by all but the super rich, will severely hamper the California boat manufacturing industry, cost untold numbers of people their jobs and will negatively affect all related businesses including vacation and tourism segments.
The EPA, environmental organizations, the NMMA, and all boaters (voters) support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 7:07 AM link roy h. | indianapolis, IN
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Tue., Jun. 19, 2007 9:39 AM link Edward W. | Walkerton-Teegarden, IN
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Tue., Jun. 19, 2007 7:31 AM link Bryan R. | Saint Petersburg, FL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Mon., Jun. 18, 2007 7:45 PM link Joshua S. | Austin, IN
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Mon., Jun. 18, 2007 5:32 PM link John A. | Ocala, FL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Mon., Jun. 18, 2007 12:36 PM link Charles W. | Simpsonville, SC
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Mon., Jun. 18, 2007 11:54 AM link Craig M. | Mohrsville, PA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Mon., Jun. 18, 2007 11:53 AM link David R. | Littlerock, CA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Mon., Jun. 18, 2007 9:18 AM link Brenda W. | Louisville, KY
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
As a Mother of two aspiring young professional bass fishermen, a wife of a recreational bass fisherman, an advocate for the youth of the state of Kentucky and the former Secretary/Treasurer of the Kentucky Bass Federation; I implore you to suport the "Recrational Boating Act of 2007". Without it, hundreds of Kentucky fishermen, pleasure boaters, and owners of private marinas and docks will be denied the right to persue the sport and activity that brings so much financial support to the state of Kentucky.
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Mon., Jun. 18, 2007 8:38 AM link Don G. | Lancaster, CA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Mon., Jun. 18, 2007 8:19 AM link Ken L. K. | Hanover, IN
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Mon., Jun. 18, 2007 7:42 AM link Todd G. | Douglasville, GA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Sun., Jun. 17, 2007 10:40 PM link Rory L. | Mansfield, AR
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Sat., Jun. 16, 2007 4:18 PM link Nathaniel T. | ST LOUIS, MO
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Sat., Jun. 16, 2007 6:28 AM link Michael C. | Escondido, CA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Sat., Jun. 16, 2007 12:35 AM link David W. | St.Louis, MO
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 15, 2007 11:19 PM link Peter R. | Friendswood, TX
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 15, 2007 11:08 PM link Richard H. | San Diego, CA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Please get Congress to act quick and restore Boater's exemption now. Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 15, 2007 3:01 PM link kevin c. | Benton, AR
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 15, 2007 12:23 PM link W. Robert J. | Hamilton, NJ
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 15, 2007 11:38 AM link Daryl W. | Modesto, CA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 15, 2007 10:32 AM link Bob O. | Aberdeen, MS
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Fri., Jun. 15, 2007 7:28 AM link Gary H. | Hamilton, OH
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 9:35 PM link Eric C. | Wilmington, NC
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 8:53 PM link Ty K. | Beaufort, SC
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 6:43 PM link Cade L. | Stoddard, WI
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
I, Cade Laufenberg, age 15 of La Crosse Wisconsin, demand that this act pass and pleasure boaters continue to use the water as they wish. I know that I personally already have a hard time supporting my own boat use due to gas prices and other financial problems. A 15 year old kid with no job cannot continue to use the water if he must first pay 800-2000 dollars. Something must be done, or my life, as well as the lives of many others, will be ruined.
Thank you for your support of this Act.
Cade A. Laufenberg
Secretary,
River Road's Junior BassMasters
La Crosse, Wisconsin
www.cadelaufenbergfishing.com
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 6:29 PM link Coy A. | Marion, OH
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 5:00 PM link Levi K. | Portsmouth, VA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 4:54 PM link Eric S. | Marion, IL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 2:13 PM link George M. | Canyon Lake, TX
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 12:55 PM link John W. | Broussard, LA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 12:54 PM link h ronald m. | Strongsville, OH
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 12:43 PM link Thomas W. | Washington, NC
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 12:20 PM link thomas h. | RICHMOND, VA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 11:07 AM link Scott J. | Chicago, IL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 10:48 AM link Donald B. | Riverside, CA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 10:48 AM link dan p. | port charlotte, FL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 8:56 AM link Jason P. | San Antonio, TX
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 8:50 AM link William T. | Raritan, NJ
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 7:56 AM link DANIEL B. | MYRTLE BEACH, SC
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 7:12 AM link David F. | Clarkston, MI
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 6:55 AM link Steven L. | Medina, OH
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 6:44 AM link James D. | Towson, MD
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 6:43 AM link James D. | Towson, MD
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 6:22 AM link STEVEN W. | MOORESVILLE, IN
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 1:20 AM link GEORGE ANDERS S. | Antioch, CA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 1:16 AM link ANNE-MARIE S. | Antioch, CA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Thu., Jun. 14, 2007 1:09 AM link GEORGE F. S. | Antioch, CA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 9:33 PM link jeff k. | Rockmart, GA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 9:21 PM link Robert H. | Sugar Land, TX
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 8:59 PM link Deborah S. | Hollywood, FL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 8:33 PM link Pamela M. | carrollton, KY
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 8:33 PM link Robert T. | Palm Harbor, FL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 8:32 PM link Robert T. | Palm Harbor, FL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 8:31 PM link Richard V. | Clarksburg, WV
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 8:22 PM link Cole S. | San Pedro, CA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 8:05 PM link Guy G. | Savannah, GA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 7:57 PM link Edwin S. | Weston, FL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 7:56 PM link Edwin S. | Weston, FL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 7:04 PM link John G. | Austin, TX
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 6:34 PM link Jeff L. | Ten Mile, TN
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 6:08 PM link howard m. | Hampton, VA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 5:56 PM link Duane C. | Oklahoma City, OK
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 5:53 PM link Edward S. | Oklahoma City, OK
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 5:53 PM link Edward S. | Oklahoma City, OK
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 5:52 PM link Edward S. | Oklahoma City, OK
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 5:47 PM link James W. | N Fort Myers, FL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 5:43 PM link Marion L. | Antioch, CA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 5:43 PM link James W. | N Fort Myers, FL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 5:35 PM link Mark M. | Dunnellon, FL
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 5:09 PM link Ryan S. | Gilbert, AZ
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 4:54 PM link Robert H. | Fairfax, VA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 4:40 PM link Dan F. | Fairfax, VA
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!
Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 4:11 PM link Gary P. | Georgetown, KY
Please support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007†which restores the exemption for pleasure boats to EPA regulations covering commercial shipping’s ballast water discharge in U.S. waters. Unless this 34-year-old EPA exemption – which was thrown out by the Ninth Circuit of Appeals in Sept. 2006 – is reinstated, 18 million recreational boats will be required to have expensive EPA permits by September, 2008.The cost of these permits will have the effect of stopping the use of most recreational boats and will kill an industry, throwing hundreds of thousands of people out of work, and will keep boat owners from enjoying their leisure time, to say nothing of denying them their property rights.
The EPA, environment groups, NMMA, and all boaters support the “Recreational Boating Act of 2007.â€
Thank you for your support of this Act.
This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!