Please Co-Sponsor S. 2766 or H.R. 5949 – they are identical bills – the "Clean Boating Act of 2008." Committees on BOTH houses have PASSED this BI-PARTISAN Legislation!

1,028 People Have Sent 9,691 Letters and Emails

Sign the Petition

Some recent comments: these messages are published with permission of the signer.

Total Signers: 1,028    View More: 11 10 9 8 7    6 5 4 3 2 1

  1. Wed., May. 7, 2008 12:44 PM    link William P. | Los Alamos, NM

    This is another ineffective government requirement that imposes time and money costs on the recreational boater without any measurable benefit. Free up the EPA for important issues.

    And if you're worried that the next campaign will accuse you of voting against an EPA initiative to "protect the environment", I think voters (I have) have started ignoring the distortion and manipulaton of voting records. It's a political trick that has been over used so much that it's no longer effective.

  2. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  3. Wed., May. 7, 2008 12:07 PM    link Jeff L. | Ten Mile, TN

  4. Wed., May. 7, 2008 12:04 PM    link Kenneth S. | Josephine, AL

    Time is growing short and I'm disappointed you are not a co-sponsor of this bill.

  5. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  6. Wed., May. 7, 2008 11:58 AM    link Brian H. | Bellingham, WA

  7. Wed., May. 7, 2008 11:47 AM    link John & Elaine M. | Gloucester City, NJ

  8. Wed., May. 7, 2008 11:40 AM    link John C. | Lorton, VA

  9. Wed., May. 7, 2008 11:40 AM    link Robert L. | New Hartford, NY

    This seems like such an easy bill to support. The idea that rain water going overboard is an issue of pollution is absurd.
    Not signing this would kill the recreational boating as we know it.
    I would like you to not only support this bill but throw your weight behind it to help it pass.
    Thank you.

  10. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  11. Wed., May. 7, 2008 11:34 AM    link John K. | Albertville, MN

  12. Wed., May. 7, 2008 11:31 AM    link John S. | Magnolia, TX

  13. Wed., May. 7, 2008 11:15 AM    link Jennifer H. | Paradise, TX

    This act, if passed, will join the annals of Global Warming, as just another governmentally supported issue that creates more financial burden on the US citizen and further eroding US quality of life, while at the same time not generating enough financial resources to be viable or even sustain it. I suspect once all the government agencies get their portion of the fee for additional personnel and equipment required to enforce the act and process the fees, the fee proceeds will fall far short of meeting the EPA’s financial burden of enforcement.

    Get real for a change and vote for less government, not more. In a free market economy, if this runoff was causing pollution issues, some resourceful individual would get ‘rich’ inventing a way to reduce or eliminate it.

  14. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  15. Wed., May. 7, 2008 11:01 AM    link scott and amber b. | maurice, LA

    Boating is a very big part of our life in S. Louisiana! We will be spending Mothers Day with the kids on our pontoon boat. Please show your support for this bill!

  16. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  17. Wed., May. 7, 2008 10:55 AM    link DONALD P. | North Palm Beach, FL

    I am a USCG certified Captain and believe strongly in S-2766. I believe requiring EPA permits for recreational boaters is absurd and more importantly, would potentially take years for the EPA to ramp up to issue said permits, and monitor the thousands and thousands of boats (If they won't be monitored, then why do it).

  18. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  19. Wed., May. 7, 2008 10:50 AM    link Brett T. | Salem, OR

    As a recreactional boater I urge you to Please Support This Bill.

    Thanks

  20. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  21. Wed., May. 7, 2008 10:43 AM    link Clarence B. | St Charles, MO

    I am in the Marine Retail Business here is St Charles MO at Bud's Place and they own 4 Retail Stores in the State of Missouri and We Contribute $1000's of Dollars in Revenue to the State in the way of Sales Tax Generated along with the Number of Employees on the Payroll. Please Vote to restore the 35 year permit for recreational boating here in Missouri.

    Clarence J Brown Jr.
    Business Manager
    Bud's Place
    636-916-4411

  22. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  23. Wed., May. 7, 2008 10:29 AM    link John M. | Northport, NY

    I support this bill and see Senator Schumer is undecided. Coming from a New York city area that encourages recreational boating this should be a no brainer and vote YES.

    I do not see Senator Clinton's name mentioned but she should also vote YES to support this bill. There are also US representatives that come from areas that make a living and provide jobs for service recreational boating within New York and should vote YES.

  24. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  25. Wed., May. 7, 2008 10:16 AM    link Andy L. | Minneapolis, MN

  26. Wed., May. 7, 2008 9:45 AM    link Robert R. | Willoughby, OH

    Failure by Congress to pass this bill will once again jeapordize the entire multi-billion dollar boating industry in much the same manner that the Luxury Tax did several decades ago. That means jobs will be lost not only on the manufacturing side but will also have a serious adverse impact on a great number of small business owners, marinas and yacht clubs.

    I know that I will place my boat in long-term storage before I'll pay a fee.

    So, Remember that Boaters are Voters, too.

  27. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  28. Tue., May. 6, 2008 12:13 PM    link Raquel V. | Norwalk, CA

    Living in Los Angeles County, I am already taxed for owning watercraft. Unfortunately, there are few lakes or waterways in Los Angeles County for pleasurable use. We pay boat and trailer licensing, we pay for liability insurance, we pay for launching, we pay for park entry, we pay for a fishing license, and if you have any money left at all, it is absorbed by the cost of gas for both traveling to the lake or waterway and then in your watercraft. Now add an additional cost? We wonder why our society has become distant. Having the opportunity to slow down and enjoy nature has become costly...

    I highly encourage my U.S. Senators and U.S. Representatives to remember when they've taken their families on family boating trips and help continue and promote the traditions of family. If we can not afford it, our children will never get the same experiences or a chance to appreciate the beauty of nature...

  29. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  30. Sun., May. 4, 2008 8:56 AM    link Michael P. | Cumming, GA

  31. Sat., May. 3, 2008 7:51 PM    link Thomas E. | Huntington Station, NY

  32. Sat., May. 3, 2008 7:42 PM    link Arthur S. | Sulphur, LA

    With the price of everything going up and the state of the economy as it is today, it is wrong to ask us to spend money we don't have on something that we don't need!!!

  33. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  34. Sat., May. 3, 2008 2:19 PM    link james k. | apple valley, MN

    Norn, pleas support this bill for the sake of all us small boat owners in Minnesota

    Jim and Mary Koskan

  35. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  36. Sat., May. 3, 2008 12:42 PM    link Steve C. | Parker, AZ

    John we az boater need this to be passed.the only thing leaving my boat is melted ice from my cooler please respond before the election..

  37. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  38. Sat., May. 3, 2008 8:46 AM    link Frederick K. | Norristown, PA

    As an environmental engineer and a recreational boat enthusiast, I believe that this bill strikes a reasonable balance in protecting the environment while respecting the sport of boating.

    I urge you to co-sponsor this bill.

    Thank you.

  39. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  40. Sat., May. 3, 2008 12:42 AM    link Martin T. | Lewisburg, OH

    It never ceases to amaze me when I read about some of the trivial things that our elected officials bring up, discuss and argue over when there are so many more serious things in our nation that need their attention. Any Senator that that does not support the passage of this bill, and expects those of us who enjoy boating to pay for an "EPA Permit" is only looking for another way to make money for the government and/or it's agencies. How much more do they think the everyday person can afford with the cost of the basics like food and gas going up so high? Instead of worrying about having boaters pay for EPA permits, how about they tackle the healthcare crisis and arrange for the rest of us to receive a wonderful retirement income as they will? Perhaps they can arrange for the everyday taxpayers to receive the same healthcare that they receive?

  41. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  42. Sat., May. 3, 2008 12:40 AM    link Martin T. | Lewisburg, OH

    It never ceases to amaze me when I read about the trivial things that our Senators bring up, discuss and argue over when there are so many more serious things in our nation that need their attention. Any Senator that that does not support the passage of this bill, and expects those of us who enjoy boating to pay for an "EPA Permit" is only looking for another way to make money for the government and/or it's agencies. How much more do they think the everyday person can afford with the cost of the basics like food and gas going up so high? Instead of worrying about having boaters pay for EPA permits, how about they tackle the healthcare crisis and arrange for the rest of us to receive a wonderful retirement income as they will? Perhaps they can arrange for the everyday taxpayers to receive the same healthcare that they receive?

  43. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  44. Fri., May. 2, 2008 5:51 PM    link Douglas D. | Seattle, WA

  45. Fri., May. 2, 2008 4:57 PM    link Donald K. | Chesterfield, MI

  46. Fri., May. 2, 2008 12:04 PM    link larry c. | Athens, GA

  47. Fri., May. 2, 2008 9:57 AM    link Saso V. | Ohrid, NJ

    Many greetings from Macedonia

  48. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  49. Fri., May. 2, 2008 12:57 AM    link Larry M. | Houston, TX

    Come on now, let's keep Texas a boater-friendly state! Get behind this act NOW!

  50. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  51. Thu., May. 1, 2008 9:32 PM    link Robert B. | Oswego, NY

    Senator Clinton, New York is one of the largest recreational boating communities in the USA. Passage of S.2766, the Clean Boating Act of 2008, is critical to the survival of New York's recreational boating industry which plays a huge economic role in upstate as well as downstate areas. With the hit this industry is going to take this year as a result of the price of fuel, please support S.2766. As a recreational and professional boater on the St Lawrence River and the Great Lakes for nearly 60 years, I would be more than happy to provide you with more information about the need for S.2766 or about the importance of recreational boating to New York state.

  52. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  53. Thu., May. 1, 2008 8:10 PM    link scott m. | north vernon, IN

    Boating is my escape from everyday life.
    I have worked 35 years for Cummins Engine Co. and looking forward to retirement, please don't make it impossible for me to go boating. I love boating as does my family.
    Please help preserve boating for me, my children and grand children . thanks,

  54. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  55. Thu., May. 1, 2008 5:35 PM    link David H. | Myakka City, FL

  56. Thu., May. 1, 2008 2:56 PM    link David N. | Newport, TN

  57. Thu., May. 1, 2008 2:34 PM    link Robert B. | Livingston, NJ

  58. Thu., May. 1, 2008 2:31 PM    link Robert B. | Livingston, NJ

  59. Thu., May. 1, 2008 2:09 PM    link Thomas K. | Chincoteague, VA

  60. Thu., May. 1, 2008 12:14 PM    link James A K. | Pittsburgh, PA

  61. Thu., May. 1, 2008 12:05 PM    link James A K. | Pittsburgh, PA

  62. Thu., May. 1, 2008 11:22 AM    link Jeff H. | Montgomery, TX

    As a weekend recreational boater this is an important issue with me. Please support Senator Boxers bill.

  63. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  64. Thu., May. 1, 2008 10:32 AM    link Jeff H. | Montgomery, TX

    As a weekend recreational boater this is an important issue with me. Please support Senator Boxers bill.

  65. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  66. Thu., May. 1, 2008 10:31 AM    link Jeff H. | Montgomery, TX

    As a weekend recreational boater this is an important issue with me. Please support Senator Boxers bill.

    Thank you,
    Mr. J.L. Hill

  67. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  68. Thu., May. 1, 2008 9:27 AM    link Wayne M. | Belle Chasse, LA

  69. Thu., May. 1, 2008 8:41 AM    link A. Craig G. | Bay Village, OH

    As a small boat owner for over 30 years on Central/Western Lake Erie, I find it incredulous that this would even be necessary. Boating has always been a tradition in our family much like camping, hiking, travelling and other traditions in other families. The EPA permit amounts to nothing more than a tax on recreational boaters that will hurt the industry and result in the reduction of related jobs.

    Please, support this bill. Thank you.

  70. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  71. Thu., May. 1, 2008 8:12 AM    link Scott and Barb S. | Sylvania, OH

    Senators,

    Because of the cost of fuel, the number of times that we can afford to go boating has been reduced dramatically. Another Governmental charge could very well be the final nail in the coffin for boating here on the Great Lakes. As one of your constituents who has never asked for anything from State Government before, I feel I'm entitled to at least one request and this is it. It's important to us but also important to those local companies, struggling to survive this economy and more Governmental fees are not needed or wanted by anyone.
    Thank You and be well.

  72. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  73. Thu., May. 1, 2008 8:11 AM    link Scott and Barb S. | Sylvania, OH

    Senator Brown,

    Because of the cost of fuel, the number of times that we can afford to go boating has been reduced dramatically. Another Governmental charge could very well be the final nail in the coffin for boating here on the Great Lakes. As one of your constituents who has never asked for anything from State Government before, I feel I'm entitled to at least one request and this is it. It's important to us but also important to those local companies, struggling to survive this economy and more Governmental fees are not needed or wanted by anyone.
    Thank You and be well.

  74. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  75. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 11:04 PM    link Richard A. | Lynnwood, WA

    I'm a big believer in caring for the environment and I have no problem with not passing the clean boating act as long as every car owner has to pay for an EPA permit for pollution caused by roadway oil runoff caused by automobiles. As an employee of an Geophysics corporation, I learned a long time ago that roadway runoff is a far greater cause of pollution than rainwater runoff from my boat.

    Please vote in favor of the Clean Boating Act of 2008. It's only fair to the boaters.

  76. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  77. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 11:03 PM    link Richard A. | Lynnwood, WA

    I'm a big believer in caring for the environment and I have no problem with not passing the clean boating act as long as every car owner has to pay for an EPA permit for pollution caused by roadway oil runoff caused by automobiles. As an employee of an Geophysics corporation, I learned a long time ago that roadway runoff is a far greater cause of pollution than rainwater runoff from my boat.

    Please vote in favor of the Clean Boating Act of 2008. It's only far to the boaters.

  78. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  79. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 11:02 PM    link Richard A. | Lynnwood, WA

    I'm a big believer in caring for the environment and I have no problem with not passing the clean boating act as long as every car owner has to pay for an EPA permit for pollution caused by roadway oil runoff. As an employee of an Geophysics corporation, I learned a long time ago that roadway runoff is a far greater cause of pollution than rainwater runoff from my boat.

    Please vote in favor of the Clean Boating Act of 2008. It's only far to the boaters.

  80. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  81. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 10:15 PM    link Larry M. | Westlake Village, CA

    Senator McCain,

    I can understand freighters, container and cruise ships being required to have EPA permits because of the nature of what they dischage overboard.

    However it doesn't make any sense for recreational boaters to be required to have such a permit. If recreational boaters are required to have an EPA permit then the next thing you know, homeowners will be required to have EPA permits just like industrial manufacturers.

    I urge you to vote FOR The Clean Boating Act, S2766 which will EXEMPT recreational boaters from having to have permits which really only apply to commercial vessels.

    Thank you.

  82. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  83. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 8:21 PM    link Jeremiah M. | knoxville, TN

    This seems like a rather clear cut case of reason here. Why is this an issue? Another reason for the government to collect money in the name of green initiatives. I think this needs to be voted away for ever. Why not try to tax runoff water? I mean jeeze, all that dirty gook running into the water supply is surely killing me and my unborn grandchildren. Just simply tax every water faucet sold, every gallon of water consumed and every water holding device taxed extra. I mean if the government was to ever use common sense, I believe this is a good time to begin. Please make a correct decision and call off the attack on boating. Vote this down because it is another instance where government is going to take more of my money!

  84. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  85. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 7:46 PM    link Jeffrey B M. | Noblesville, IN

  86. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 7:43 PM    link talley r. | jasper, TN

  87. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 7:42 PM    link Scott B. | Crofton, MD

    Boating is a joy for my whole family. It is something we struggle to afford. With the cost of gas, and the problems with etoh added to the gas. Please help keep this wonderful sport open to every one.

  88. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  89. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 7:41 PM    link Scott B. | Crofton, MD

    Senator Cardin, Boating is a joy for my whole family. It is something we struggle to afford. With the cost of gas, and the problems with etoh added to the gas. Please help keep this wonderful sport open to every one.

  90. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  91. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 7:15 PM    link Alfred P. | Pembroke, GA

    You support me in this,I will support you.Alfred Price-Williams

  92. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  93. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 7:02 PM    link Alfred P. | Pembroke, GA

    If you give up my boat and I.I will give you up.Alfred Price-Williams

  94. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  95. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 6:23 PM    link Tommy T. | Grapevine, TX

    Boating is the only pass time we have. We own a small used boat we use for fishing and other water fun, we could use your help keeping this affordable.

  96. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  97. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 5:46 PM    link Kenneth C. | Abilene, KS

  98. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 5:25 PM    link Edward D. | Lagrangeville, NY

  99. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 3:57 PM    link John G. | Prospect, KY

    I am sure you are aware of the thousands of KY citizens who are boaters, not to mention the thousands of out of state boaters who travel to KY waters for boating and vacationing. Boating is very important economically to many areas throughout our state.

  100. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  101. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 3:07 PM    link Randy H. | Bellevue, WA

    I would ask that you do not delay in making your support known.

  102. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  103. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 3:06 PM    link Randy H. | Bellevue, WA

  104. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 2:27 PM    link Judson B. | Yorktown, VA

  105. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 2:05 PM    link Marc G. | Lutz, FL

    I live in Tampa and boat in the Gulf and ICW. I take extreme care of any and all discharges. The increased cost of fuel has already added costs and decreased values. This additional expense will virtually kill boating, asset values and the industry except for a rare few. Please continue to fight the good fight for bill S. 2766.

  106. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  107. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 2:02 PM    link Andrew M. | Grove City, OH

  108. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 1:59 PM    link Marlana B. | Watkins Glen, NY

    With the gas prices climbing, we can barely afford to use our boat now. We have a son with autism and our boat is our vacation and recreation. It is our summer! Help us to keep it.

  109. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  110. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 1:54 PM    link Dietmar S. | Marshfield, MA

    Messrs. Kennedy, Kerry and Delahunt, we really must do something about this bill. Perhaps a size limitation or similar. In its current form the Clean boating Act appears to be more than excessive:

    "Would ... restore a 35-year permit exemption for recreational boat incidental discharges, such as weather deck run-off and engine coolant water". Come on now let's be sensible!

  111. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  112. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 1:49 PM    link Tim W. | Independence, KS

  113. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 1:30 PM    link Jeffrey S. | Voluntown, CT

    I am a huge environmentalist, and a boater. Recreational boaters are not the cause of any sort of oceanic disturbance (chemical or wildlife based). As technology improves, so do boats. The waterways are one of the last highly regulated parts of our life, which is why it's so enjoyable. An Act like this isn't the answer to anything nor would it accomplish anything except making the USA that much more restricted.

  114. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  115. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 1:24 PM    link Jane V. | Fairport, NY

    I am writing to urge you to co-sponsor S.2766, the clean boating act of 2008. Passage of this bill would allow the people you represent to continue to enjoy an activity that brings millions of dollars into our New York economy each year. Do you realize that $39.5 million is spent on boating annually, and that boating has a $108 billion direct impact on our country's economy? Do you also realize that 75% of all boat owners have a household income of LESS than $100,000? These figures alone should be reason enough to get behind this bill, not only for the country's sake, but for the sake of those who voted you into office, and expect you to represent and protect us in the right way.
    Please take the time to add your name to the 30 Senators from around our 50 states who have put their support behind this very important piece of legislation. We are all counting on you to do the right thing.

  116. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  117. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 1:22 PM    link Tiffany H. | Conway, SC

    PLEASE vote in favor of the Clean Boating Act of 2008! Many insudtries/companies in all states rely on the marine industry! It would be more than detrimental / disgraceful if our own elected officials cannot vote appropriately in favor of their contingents! As if our own government can even control the already rising costs of living, fuel, etc. DONT MAKE THIS ECONOMY WORSE BY WORKING AGAINST THE PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!

  118. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  119. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 1:03 PM    link Frank F. | Perrysburg, OH

  120. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 12:41 PM    link Bruce H. | Santee, CA

    Because of this threat my business On The Edge Watersport, Inc. has closed. The general public is retracting there investment dollars into the watersports industry. I have had to lay off 12 employees and close my doors. In addition to this bill our local lake, San Vicente in San Diego County is going through a rebuilding project. I am predicting that when the lake reopens all water contact will be eliminated and the watersports industry will be dead in Southern California.

    I am asking you to support our rights to fresh water contact and use in California. This has been a great family experience and we have helped our community thru my efforts with Camp Hope at Lake Sutherland.

    Please don’t let our sport and our families enjoy this activity.

    Bruce Hubbard
    619-990-8676 cell

  121. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  122. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 12:24 PM    link Dennis G. | Hilton Head, SC

    Please read and understand this bill berfore you vote on it ,and please know that there is not one boat owner in this state that not sponsor this bill.

  123. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  124. Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 9:21 AM    link Steve R. | Indian River, MI

    Michigan's economy is damaged enough already....to punish recreational boat dollars will push Michigan deeper into economic depression. Please support this bill!! Thank you

  125. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  126. Tue., Apr. 29, 2008 6:19 PM    link Chad B. | Lindstrom, MN

    Give us a break you have to much free time to come up with stupid ideas!!!!!

  127. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  128. Tue., Apr. 29, 2008 3:52 PM    link william f. | Quincy, MA

  129. Tue., Apr. 29, 2008 1:28 PM    link Gregory S. | Pleasantville, OH

  130. Tue., Apr. 29, 2008 8:43 AM    link Vincent P. | Hazlet, NJ

    I have been waiting 30 years to buy a boat and just did so last year. I joined to the US Power Squadron where we all take seriously our boating and the environmental impact we have.

    Please don't kill the 1 true hobby I love that helps keep me sane amongst all of the insanity in this world. It's already a very expensive hobby and is getting worse as the price of gasoline sky rockets. Enough already with taxes and fees!

  131. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  132. Sun., Apr. 27, 2008 10:39 PM    link Pamela S. | Chicago, IL

  133. Sun., Apr. 27, 2008 7:06 PM    link gregory c. | Baldwinsville, NY

    boating cost more $ in new york this year(canals fee reinstatement) please don,t vote for anything that is going to cost me more money

  134. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  135. Sun., Apr. 27, 2008 1:06 PM    link Sean B. | San Diego, CA

  136. Sun., Apr. 27, 2008 10:33 AM    link Bernard J. F. | Evansville, IN

    EVANSVILLE, IN. VOTER REQUEST:

    Please be aware that the recreational boating industry, from suppliers to manufactures to retailers to the family boater face unexpected and unexplainable daily increases in the costs of fuel--not just at the fuel docks, but by anything and everything transported by road, rail, and water.

    The addition of yet another high dollar expense, such as the propsed EPA Permit Requirement could spell doom for not just the recreational boater, but surge through the entire boating industry coast-to-coast. As you know, INDIANA has many rivers, lakes, streams and boating related industries, marinas, dealers and boaters that will be negatively impacted without your support.

    Your support of S.2766 is essential for protecting over 12 million registered recreational boaters, and hundreds of millions of boating industry associated jobs throughout INDIANA, and the nation.

  137. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  138. Sun., Apr. 27, 2008 10:31 AM    link Bernard J. F. | Evansville, IN

    EVANSVILLE, IN. VOTER REQUEST:

    Please be aware that the recreational boating industry, from suppliers to manufactures to retailers to the family boater face unexpected and unexplainable daily increases in the costs of fuel--not just at the fuel docks, but by anything and everything transported by road, rail, and water.

    The addition of yet another high dollar expense, such as the propsed EPA Permit Requirement could spell doom for not just the recreational boater, but surge through the entire boating industry coast-to-coast. As you know, INDIANA has many rivers, lakes, streams and boating related industries, marinas, dealers and boaters that will be negatively impacted without your support.

    Your support of S.2766 is essential for protecting over 12 million registered recreational boaters, and hundreds of millions of boating industry associated jobs.

  139. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  140. Sun., Apr. 27, 2008 10:26 AM    link Bernard J. F. | Evansville, IN

    EVANSVILLE, IN. VOTER REQUEST:

    Please be aware that the recreational boating industry, from suppliers to manufactures to retailers to the family boater face unexpected and unexplainable daily increases in the costs of fuel--not just at the fuel docks, but by anything and everything transported by road, rail, and water.

    The addition of yet another high dollar expense, such as the propsed EPA Permit Requirement could spell doom for not just the recreational boater, but surge through the entire boating industry coast-to-coast.

    Your support of S.2766 is essential for protecting over 12 million registered recreational boaters, and hundreds of millions of boating industry associated jobs.

  141. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  142. Sun., Apr. 27, 2008 10:20 AM    link Bernard J. F. | Evansville, IN

    Please be aware that the recreational boating industry, from suppliers to manufactures to retailers to the family boater face unexpected and unexplainable daily increases in the costs of fuel--not just at the fuel docks, but by anything and everything transported by road, rail, and water.

    The addition of yet another high dollar expense, such as the propsed EPA Permit Requirement could spell doom for not just the recreational boater, but surge through the entire boating industry coast-to-coast.

    Your support of S.2766 is essential for protecting over 15 million recreational boaters, and hundreds of millions of boating industry associated jobs.

  143. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  144. Sat., Apr. 26, 2008 9:01 PM    link Dale M. | Sandusky, OH

  145. Sat., Apr. 26, 2008 3:36 PM    link Allen C. | ISLAND PARK, NY

    We as boaters and I myself have to endure tremendous expense to enjoy our sport. In addition, we are under full control of the gov't as to what fish we can keep and not keep. I love boating, but with the cost of fuel and dockage, if it is made any more expensive I will give up the boat and find something else to do. It has taken thousands of years to destroy the environment and I am sure they didn't have power boats around back then to blame. Please make sure that you vote for this bill so I can continue to do what love. Thank you.

  146. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  147. Sat., Apr. 26, 2008 2:36 PM    link Eric H. | Dayton, OH

  148. Sat., Apr. 26, 2008 12:46 PM    link William H M. | Stuart, FL

    Dear Senator Martinez:

    I find it had to believe you are not yet a supporter of the Clean Boating Act exemption for recreational vessels. A Senator from Florida the state with the largest number of recreational vessels and a marine industry that is either the second or third largest industry in Florida. What are you thinking? Please get on board and ask your undecided colleagues to do the same.

    William H Martz III

  149. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  150. Sat., Apr. 26, 2008 10:58 AM    link Mark H. | West Allis, WI

    With both and the only United States manufactures of marine engines located in Wisconsin, I would certainly hope you will vote to pass this bill.

  151. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  152. Sat., Apr. 26, 2008 10:20 AM    link DANIEL M. | PACE, FL

    I AGREE 100% WITH THIS ACT.

  153. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  154. Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 9:12 PM    link Kelly G. | Powder Springs, GA

    I agree that we need to protect our waterways, but we need to be smart about it. Educating recreational boaters about the damages that can happen to the environment and how to eliminate the hazards is a better option than mandating permits.

  155. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  156. Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 8:15 PM    link james m. | hershey, PA

    Give us a break. We are the people who support an entire economy that thrives on free enterprize and saving money for what we think is important. This bill is crazy. Why not think about bills that really matter. Jim Mulligan

  157. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  158. Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 6:37 PM    link HERBERT K. | Northport, FL

  159. Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 5:49 PM    link Brian W. | Melissa, TX

  160. Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 4:43 PM    link David W. | Sandy, UT

    Dear Senators,

    I'm seeking your support with S.2766 the (Clean Boating Act of 2008). This exemption as I'm sure your aware, has been in place for decades and rightfully so.

    Please give close attention to the changes to the recreational boating world if this bill were to not pass. Considering the extreme rise in fuel costs, taxes and local economies at the present time, this additional expense would spell doom for many recreational boaters. The impact would reach those in service of this recreational activity which is already suffering greatly. Recreational boaters should not have to pay a tax, fee, assessment or anything of the like to pay for what this EPA permit was originaly designed to help with.

    It may seem to some that if you boat you can afford it. This is simply not true. Most americans such as yourselve's have a passion or hobby. It may be golf, a sports car, snow skiing, etc., and as you know it is expensive already to do any of these activities we all enjoy so much. Most of us who boat can hardly afford it at the present time. Please consider keeping our costs in check for the impacts that we do have on the environment and and already pay for. Don't have us pay a user/damage fee that we are not responsible for.

    Thanks for your support!!!

  161. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

  162. Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 4:20 PM    link Amy W. | Rockford, IL

    I support this bill.

  163. This comment has been reported to the site manager. It will be reviewed and removed if inappropriate. Thank you!

Total Signers: 1,028    View More: 11 10 9 8 7    6 5 4 3 2 1

Sign the Petition

Petition created by Boattest Congress

Powered by Rally Congress    Have questions or feedback?